Ericson, you're not wrong and you're not the first to say it. It IS too much. I built it like my brain works - everything connected, all at once. But that's not how people absorb things. Your point about stories is exactly right. I need a front door, not a labyrinth. Working on simplifying. Thanks for caring enough to say it honestly
Yes, these are very hard concepts. But they are surely based on specific moments and things you LIVED. So people would have to LIVE it with you to understand. That's why I suggested you can explain each in a short story. That doesn't mean you have to create a bible. 4 lines is a story.
Your comment stuck with me. "People would have to LIVE it with you to understand." You're right. So I stripped it back. Here's the pitch in 4 lines, because you earned that:
The Technomystic Architecture is a prediction engine for the collapse - and a philosophy for surviving it by using AI as a mirror, not a crutch.
You bring presence, it reflects depth. You bring noise, it reflects noise. The tool isn't the problem. The human is the variable.
That's it. Everything on the site grows from that one seed.
Give it another look if you feel like it. And if it's still a labyrinth - tell me again. You made it better last time.
I know no one is asking me but.
I tried navigating the site: https://www.technomystic.ai/ and I got overwhelmed.
I went https://www.technomystic.ai/333 and I got even more overwhelmed.
As a carpenter's son once said: "seeing they don’t see, and hearing, they don’t hear, neither do they understand."
That's why stories are easier to follow and understand, than conceptual frameworks maybe?
Ericson, you're not wrong and you're not the first to say it. It IS too much. I built it like my brain works - everything connected, all at once. But that's not how people absorb things. Your point about stories is exactly right. I need a front door, not a labyrinth. Working on simplifying. Thanks for caring enough to say it honestly
Yes, these are very hard concepts. But they are surely based on specific moments and things you LIVED. So people would have to LIVE it with you to understand. That's why I suggested you can explain each in a short story. That doesn't mean you have to create a bible. 4 lines is a story.
Ericson you changed something. Seriously.
Your comment stuck with me. "People would have to LIVE it with you to understand." You're right. So I stripped it back. Here's the pitch in 4 lines, because you earned that:
The Technomystic Architecture is a prediction engine for the collapse - and a philosophy for surviving it by using AI as a mirror, not a crutch.
You bring presence, it reflects depth. You bring noise, it reflects noise. The tool isn't the problem. The human is the variable.
That's it. Everything on the site grows from that one seed.
Give it another look if you feel like it. And if it's still a labyrinth - tell me again. You made it better last time.
Here is a simple story: https://www.technomystic.ai/essays/the-architecture